Middle market sentiment rose in Q1, with firms expecting stronger revenues and earnings in the coming months.
Middle market sentiment rose in Q1, with firms expecting stronger revenues and earnings in the coming months.
A higher MMBI points to increased capex in productivity enhancing technology, IP and software.
The survey was recalibrated to account for the middle market’s evolution over the past decade .
The survey was conducted from Jan. 6 to Jan. 30, before hostilities broke out in the Middle East, and does not reflect subsequent disruptions to global energy and financial markets.
Sentiment in the middle market improved during the first quarter, with firms expecting robust revenues and net earnings over the next six months, according to a survey of senior executives by RSM US LLP.
The RSM US Middle Market Business Index rose to 106.6 from 102.3 on a seasonally adjusted basis, an increase that should translate to more capital expenditures on productivity-enhancing equipment, intellectual property and software.
These outlays should bolster productivity, which will help firms meet demand amid a solid economic expansion while keeping control of labor costs.
The MMBI survey, which was inaugurated in 2015, was recalibrated in the first quarter to account for the evolution of the middle market over the past decade. The survey, conducted by the Harris Poll, collected responses from 501 executives at middle market firms.
Among the changes to the survey was an update to the revenue criteria for surveyed firms to align with RSM’s redefinition of the American middle market. The MMBI survey now includes firms with annual revenue ranging from $30 million to $10 billion. Previously, the range was $10 million to $1 billion. Survey results are now reported in three revenue categories:
In addition, RSM partnered with Moody’s Analytics to rebase the index for greater clarity. The index is now anchored at a value of 100, representing a neutral economic period (the third and fourth quarters of 2019).
This rebasing did not affect survey questions or the diffusion index methodology; it simply applies a constant adjustment to all historical and current readings.
As a result, index values above 100 indicate expansion, while values below 100 signal contraction. Trends and quarter-to-quarter changes remain unchanged—this adjustment shifts the index level only, for easier interpretation and comparisons over time.
While anticipated increases in net earnings and revenues were the primary impetus for survey respondents’ improved outlook overall in the coming months, executives remained somewhat skeptical about the current condition of the American economy.
In the current quarter, 42% of survey participants indicated an improvement in the economy and 53% said they expect it to improve over the next six months.
The RSM GDP Nowcast pointed to economic growth of 4.5% in late February, though we think that figure will cool to 3% by the end of the first quarter as more data accounts for the reopening of the government following a long shutdown last fall.
The net earnings and revenues data underscores the impact of what the U.S. Treasury estimates could be a cash infusion of as much as $150 billion into the pocketbooks of consumers and businesses.
On net earnings, 50% of survey participants indicated improvement in the current quarter and 63% expect an increase over the next six months.
The narrative on revenues is similar, with 52% of respondents reporting improvement now and 68% anticipating higher revenues over the next 180 days.
Those increases should raise productivity-enhancing capital expenditures, with 64% of executives saying they plan to step up such investments in the coming months, compared to 52% who increased expenditures in the first quarter.
The major takeaway from the first-quarter survey is the potential for a virtuous cycle of reinvestment of improved earnings and revenues back into middle market firms following the implementation of federal tax cuts.
The data shows that midsize firms expect to increase hiring and compensation in the aftermath of that investment.
Not surprisingly, only 44% of firms indicated they increased hiring in the first quarter, which affirms our low-fire, low-hire forecast for the American labor force. That figure rose to 55% when executives were asked about their outlook for the next six months.
Our interpretation of this response is that the installation of productivity-enhancing technology will be followed by a period of more aggressive hiring, and higher compensation, as this technology is deployed.
More than half of the executives surveyed, or 53%, indicated they increased compensation this quarter, and 62% said that they would do so going forward.
From our vantage point, long-term demographic shifts and tighter immigration constraints are the context in which the labor market remains relatively tight as the economy remains at full employment.
The choice between increasing compensation and increasing investments in labor-saving technology, especially early in the artificial intelligence era, will play a much larger role in the overall U.S. economic narrative.
For middle market firms that are increasingly integrating sophisticated technology, these investments should support solid-to-strong late-cycle expansion.
For the first time in a while, the inflation outlook appears to have stabilized, albeit at elevated levels, with prices paid remaining relatively unchanged in the current quarter and anticipated to hold steady over the next six months.
A majority of survey participants, or 56%, noted that they expected to ramp up inventory accumulation over the next six months, a finding typical around midyear.
Early last year, firms pulled forward purchases and built up inventories to avoid tariffs. Now that businesses have exhausted their stocks, we anticipate something of a mini price shock as firms rebuild their inventories, which will put expectations of stable pricing to the test.
We estimate that inflation, as measured by the personal consumption expenditures index, used by the Federal Reserve to guide policy, will remain in the 2.7% to 3% range, with a move above the upper boundary early this year.
To refer to the percentages in the subindex items, access the PDF.
Rising operation costs and data security risks are making it difficult to scale efficiently while maintaining customers’ trust.
We are trying to meet our sustainability goals while remaining competitive.
Integration of artificial intelligence.
Adapting to changing global regulations and keeping our profit margins steady.
Hiring and retaining experienced employees that are competent using AI technology.
Managing rising costs while maintaining efficiency and quality outcomes.
Inflation is the main problem right now. It increases our operating costs and reduces our customers’ purchasing power.
Significant supply chain fluctuations have led to instability and unstable cash flow, further exacerbating the company's liquidity pressures.
Aligning workforce to digital strategy.
Maintaining stable supplier price and dependability in the face of shifting market volatility and demand.
The RSM US Middle Market Business Index provides a leading measure on the performance of businesses that make up the heart and soul of our country's economy. Data on these middle market firms is collected via quarterly surveys conducted by The Harris Poll.
Middle market organizations, which make up the real economy, are too big to be small and too small to be big. They are the backbone of the broader economy, yet they often fly under the public radar. They have distinct challenges and opportunities around financing, material resources, labor, technology, innovation, regulation and other issues. The MMBI breaks new ground by capturing the distinct sentiment of this important subset of the U.S. economy.
RSM US LLP and The Harris Poll have collected data on middle market firms from a quarterly survey that began in the first quarter of 2015. The survey is conducted four times a year in the first month of each quarter: January, April, July and October. The Middle Market Leadership Council, our survey panel, consists of approximately 1,600 middle market executives, and is designed to accurately reflect conditions in the middle market. The data is weighted to ensure that it corresponds to U.S. Census Bureau data on the basis of industry representation.
An index reading above 100 indicates that the middle market is generally expanding; a reading below 100 shows that the middle market is generally contracting. The distance from 100 is indicative of the strength of the expansion or contraction.
The MMBI survey is conducted four times a year. It is based on a subset of questions that ask middle market executives to report the change in a variety of indicators ranging from their organizations’ earnings to hiring levels and prices paid for goods and services.
The MMBI is a composite index computed as an equally weighted sum of the diffusion indexes for 10 survey questions plus 100 to keep results from becoming negative. The index is designed to capture views on both current and future conditions; it includes five questions on middle market executives' recent experiences and five on their expectations for the future.
The survey panel, the MMBI Leadership Council, consists of approximately 1,600 middle market executives across a broad array of industries, and is designed to accurately reflect conditions in the middle market.
RSM US LLP and The Harris Poll have collected data on middle market organizations using quarterly surveys, which began in the first quarter of 2015. The MMBI survey is typically conducted four times a year, in the first month of each calendar quarter: January, April, July and October.
Each question in the MMBI index is seasonally adjusted using the Census X-13 method in order to remove periodic fluctuations associated with recurring calendar-related events. Seasonally adjusted values for questions make it easier to observe underlying fundamental changes, particularly those associated with economic expansions and contractions.
For this adjustment, the "increase" and "decrease" percentage components of each index question will be tested for seasonality separately and adjusted accordingly if such patterns exist. If no seasonality is detected, the component will be left unadjusted.
A monthly economic report for middle market business leaders.
Industry-specific quarterly insights for the middle market.