type
sm-banner
background-image
background-color
grey
eyebrow
Article
title

FASB issues final standard on joint venture formations

date
September 29, 2023
gradient-overlay
gray
breadcrumb

Home

Insights

Financial reporting

  • Financial reporting
  • Business combinations
  • Presentation & disclosures
  • Audit

The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued final Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2023-05, Business Combinations – Joint Venture Formations (Subtopic 805-60): Recognition and Initial Measurement. The ASU was issued to address the current diversity in practice when accounting for joint venture formations in the separate financial statements of the joint venture. Currently, transactions between a corporate joint venture and its owners are outside the scope of Topic 845, Nonmonetary Transactions, and the accounting for the formation of a joint venture is outside the scope of Topic 805, Business Combinations. Although there is a definition for “joint venture” in FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Master Glossary, the lack of guidance on the initial measurement of assets contributed and liabilities assumed in a newly formed joint venture has led to diversity in practice.

To reduce the diversity in practice and improve the usefulness of information provided to a joint venture’s investors, the ASU requires a newly formed joint venture to apply a new basis of accounting for its identifiable assets and liabilities and any non-controlling interest (NCI). Therefore, in accordance with the new guidance, a joint venture will initially measure its assets and liabilities at fair value at the date of formation, which is broadly consistent with the accounting outcome that would result from treating the joint venture as the acquirer in a business combination.

The new guidance does not change the accounting by an equity method investor for its investment in the joint venture or the accounting for contributions received by a joint venture after its formation. Additionally, the scope of new guidance does not include the accounting for a joint venture that is proportionately consolidated by one or more of the venturers, the accounting for formations of entities determined to be not-for-profit entities in accordance with Topic 958, Not-for-Profit Entities, or collaborative arrangements within the scope of Topic 808, Collaborative Arrangements, unless any part of the arrangement is conducted in a separate legal entity that meets the definition of a joint venture.

What are the new requirements?

Under the new guidance, an entity will undertake the following steps in accounting for a joint venture formation:

Disclosures, effective date, and transition

The ASU requires a joint venture to disclose information about the nature and financial effect of the joint venture formation in the period in which the formation date occurs, including information about:

The ASU is effective for joint ventures with formation dates occurring on or after January 1, 2025. Early adoption of the new standard is permitted in any interim or annual period. The required application method for the standard is prospective. Full retrospective application is available for any joint ventures formed before January 1, 2025, that voluntarily decide to adopt the guidance, subject to the availability of sufficient information to do so.

RSM commentary

The definition of “joint venture” in the ASC Master Glossary was not amended by the new ASU. Companies will need to continue to carefully assess whether the legal entity structure formed, even if described or referred to as a joint venture, meets the criteria to be accounted for within the scope of the new guidance. Under the new guidance, this assessment becomes even more critical because a company not only has to determine whether the legal entity meets the definition of a “joint venture,” it also must determine the date at which the legal entity initially met the definition. That date will dictate the single formation date at which all contributions from the venturers to form the entity should be recognized and measured.

In practice, formations of joint ventures often comprise multiple contributions over a period of time. Companies should review the factors provided in the ASU to assist in (1) determining the formation date and (2) distinguishing between contributions that are part of the formation and those that are not. It should not be assumed that the formation date under the new guidance is the legal entity formation date or the date that the venturers contributed their respective assets (i.e., the measurement date for the venturer’s accounting purposes).